Dear Dr. D.,
I realize now I may have said some things which may have been upsetting during our idle chit-chat. Upon reflection, i took some time to write this email, both as an apology and as an elaboration, and I hope you know, in advance, I am a strange king of guy who reads alot of books and research as a means to cope with reality. Having grown up in the 1980s, knowing about the Central America wars of death squads and famine regimes run by the wealthy landowners, I have been cursed with this loss of social norms concerning appropriate subject matters. So here are some elaborations I put forth to engage in friendly conversation. Make do with it as you do, and, please, correct or add as given, since this hobby of collecting history serves no purpose but my own edification. I say things which I won't say without documentation.
You should hear me go on with the corporations supporting hunger regimes in Latin America throughout the 18th, 19th, 20th and so on... as it is in the Americas, so it was to be in Europe until the 1950s. Hanky Kissinger helped put forward the argument for starvation regimes as protection for international capitalism in the USA's "National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests", which implemented an international economic regime which slowed the population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs), national governance models acting as dependencies of the market whose purpose were to manage national resources for Anaconda Copper in Bolivia (with slave labor on their mines until the slave rebellion of the 1950s), for example. These gods-of-men see no purpose to world governance than but to stabilize the world market. So that those "corporate" Persons can extract a profit, by any means necessary.
Such a paradigm I suffer, for to know, it is to know. Nothing more. I still can't conceive what use is history, except, perhaps as an illegal hobby, as according to the whispers of people who suffer wrath of our domestic security forces, eh? And it is now politically incorrect to speak of the 4 million dead of Indochina 1965 to 1975 (or 10 million 1955 to 1995 through the clandestine wars, economic sanctions, and chemical warfare with agent orange etc.). Or the millions dead in Iraq. Suffer such, it is nonsense. So, with that being said...
Asuchwitz 2, named Monowitz, was not the Auschwitz 1 with a million deaths (which had it's own purpose). Monowitz was a 50/50 "marriage" cartel between John D. Rockefeller's United States-based Standard Oil Co. and I.G. Farben., and was where developments in petroleum extracts were experimented with, developed, and used for further research on atomics, biological and chemical applications for consumer and industrial uses. There weren't many deaths among the workers on-site, but most were hired-out in a system across Germany and conquered territories to the east, and many died throughout the war by bombings from the allies USSR, UK, and USA, as well as by a hostile regime of Fascism. You might find it interesting that the slave laborers of Monowitz were employed directly by the corporations traded in the stock exchanges of San Francisco and New York, and to a degree supported Hitler's "Neue Europa" as a bulwark against the USSR and it's market-destabilizing nationalist revolutions it was inspiring across the British and French empires.
Rockefeller's company, and his investors, had owned out-right the keys and levers of the Neue Europa's war machine, through the SS of Europa they had lawyers and company boardroom officers in charge of the details of war. And so it was under the regime of Roosevelt during the 1930s, with Standard Oil company hitmen given rank of Colonel or whatever in the various War Departments. Texaco sent the fuel for the war-machine of fascist Francisco Franco, the Catholic hero of Royalty, but that's another story. It is good to know the history of corporate government, what little we can despite the efforts of copyright and secrecy lawyers.
The Monowitz R&D was the size of any war site, like the secret "Science Cities" of Stalin, or in Japan, it eclipsed Alameda city in size in population at any time between 1941 to 1944. The site was part of a larger network, no concentration camp is without use where they are built, and companies with profits to manage had something to value in terms of human worth. Today we see labor camps in the USA with Federal work contract for the military. Ask me sometime, and I will tell how your congressman George Miller helped abolish one created on the Federal level by the Republican Party during the 1990s as the "perfect petri-dish of capitalism", or you can find out more here [
link].
